Saucony vs. Brooks: Which Running Shoe Wins in 2025?

Choosing the perfect running shoe can feel overwhelming. With so many brands and models to consider, finding the right fit requires research and careful comparison.

Two brands that consistently stand out in the running community are Saucony and Brooks. Both have built a strong reputation for quality, innovation, and performance. But which one is the best choice for you?

In this guide, we’ll compare Saucony and Brooks across key factors like technology, fit, durability, and performance. By the end, you’ll have a clear idea of which brand aligns best with your running needs.

Saucony stands out with its responsive PWRRUN EVA-based cushioning, sleek modern designs featuring bold color accents, and the iconic Endorphin series, appealing to runners seeking speed and style. In contrast, Brooks offers balanced cushioning through DNA LOFT and BioMoGo DNA technologies, classic designs with neutral color options, and the wildly popular Ghost—arguably one of the top running shoes in the U.S.

Brooks Ghost 16 (Release: May 2024)  

• Stack Height: 32 mm (heel), 20 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 12 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Daily Trainer (versatile for everyday runs, neutral support)

Brooks Glycerin 22 (Release: February 2025)  

• Stack Height: 36 mm (heel), 26 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 10 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Max Cushion (long-distance runs, recovery runs)

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 (Release: November 2024)  

• Stack Height: 36 mm (heel), 28 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 10 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Stability (daily training for runners with overpronation)

Brooks Launch 11 (Release: December 2024)  

• Stack Height: 29 mm (heel), 21 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Performance (speed workouts, tempo runs, light training)

Brooks Hyperion 2 (Release: July 2024)  

• Stack Height: 32 mm (heel), 24 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Performance (speed workouts, tempo runs, races)

Brooks Cascadia 18 (Release: July 2024)  

• Stack Height: 20 mm (heel), 12 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Trail Running (rugged trails, off-road conditions)

Related: Brooks Running Shoes: 5 Footwear-Manager Picks to Run Happy

Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 (Release: March 2024)

• Stack Height: 39 mm (heel), 35 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 4 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Performance (speed workouts, tempo runs, races like 5K to marathon)

Saucony Triumph 22 (Release: May 2024)  

• Stack Height: 37 mm (heel), 27 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 10 mm
• Primary Use: Road Running / Max Cushion (easy and long runs, max-cushioned for comfort and stability)

Saucony Guide 17 (Release: February 2024)  

• Stack Height: 30 mm (heel), 22 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Stability (daily training for runners with mild to moderate overpronation)

Saucony Ride 17 (Release: May 2024)  

• Stack Height: 35 mm (heel), 27 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Daily Trainer (versatile for everyday runs)

Saucony Kinvara 15 (Release: July 2024)  

• Stack Height: 29 mm (heel), 25 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 4 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Lightweight (tempo runs, races, minimalist running)

Saucony Peregrine 15 (Release: July 2024)  

• Stack Height: 31 mm (heel), 27 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 4 mm  
• Primary Use: Trail Running (rugged trails, off-road conditions)

Related: Pro Picks: 9 Best Saucony Running Shoes for Training & Racing

Understanding a brand’s heritage can provide insight into its design philosophy and innovation.

Saucony was founded in 1898 near Saucony Creek in Pennsylvania. The brand gained traction in the 1980s and 1990s with iconic models like the Jazz and Shadow, which pushed the boundaries of comfort and technology.

Brooks, established in 1914, originally produced ballet and bathing shoes. In the 1970s, during the U.S. running boom, Brooks pivoted its focus entirely to running footwear. The release of its DNA cushioning technology in 2006 solidified its reputation for innovation.

Today, both brands are industry leaders, consistently delivering high-quality running shoes that cater to different types of runners and preferences.

Both brands have developed advanced cushioning technologies designed to enhance performance and comfort.

• Saucony’s PWRRUN: This lightweight foam offers a responsive, cushioned ride while reducing impact on joints. It’s a step up from the previous EVERUN material, providing better energy return.
• Brooks’ DNA LOFT & BioMoGo DNA: DNA LOFT delivers ultra-soft cushioning without sacrificing responsiveness. BioMoGo DNA adapts to your stride, weight, and speed, ensuring a personalized feel with every step.

Both brands excel in cushioning, so the choice comes down to personal preference—whether you prefer a springy feel (Saucony) or a plush, adaptive ride (Brooks).

Feedback from the running community highlights the strengths of both brands:

• Saucony: Praised for its comfortable fit, lightweight feel, and responsiveness.
• Brooks: Known for its reliable cushioning, durability, and smooth ride.

Experts often highlight Saucony’s advancements in materials and Brooks’ focus on biomechanics. Ultimately, both brands have strong followings for good reason.

Running shoes combine performance with personal style, and both Saucony and Brooks excel in this area.

• Saucony offers bold, vibrant designs with modern, sporty aesthetics, appealing to runners seeking statement-making footwear.
• Brooks features classic, sophisticated looks with understated, versatile designs, catering to those who prefer traditional elegance.

Both brands align with fashion trends, providing stylish options that maintain high functionality for diverse preferences.

Both brands offer models across various price ranges:

• Saucony: Generally more budget-friendly, providing premium features at competitive prices.
• Brooks: Slightly pricier but known for consistent quality and comfort.

While both brands offer great value, Saucony is a strong choice for runners seeking affordability, while Brooks delivers reliable performance for those willing to invest a little more.

Finding the right running shoe is all about what works best for your stride and goals. Here, we’re putting Brooks and Saucony head-to-head in key categories—daily trainers, max cushioning, stability, and trail running—to help you decide. Whether you're cruising through easy miles or tackling rugged terrain, these matchups break down what each brand does best. 

When it comes to a reliable daily trainer, the Brooks Ghost and Saucony Ride are crowd favorites for neutral runners who want a shoe that can handle just about anything. These shoes are the kind you’d grab for your everyday runs, but they each bring a different vibe to the pavement. Here’s how they compare:  

• Brooks Ghost: Feels like a cozy hug for your feet, with cushioning that absorbs every step, making those long, steady runs feel effortless—like floating on a cloud during a Sunday morning jog.  
• Saucony Ride: Delivers a peppier, more lively ride, giving you that extra bounce to pick up the pace, perfect for when you’re feeling a bit more spirited on your neighborhood loop.

The Ghost is your go-to if you crave a plush, comforting ride for racking up miles, while the Ride suits runners who want a bit more snap and energy to keep things lively

For runners who prioritize a plush, cushioned experience on long runs, the Brooks Glycerin and Saucony Triumph are dream picks that make every mile feel softer—but they cater to different vibes. Think of these as your long-distance companions, each offering a unique kind of comfort. Here’s the rundown:  

• Brooks Glycerin: Feels like running on pillows, with a super-soft landing that makes your legs feel fresh even after hours on the road—perfect for those marathon training days when you just want to sink into the ride.  
• Saucony Triumph: Gives you a bouncy, springy feel, like there’s a little trampoline underfoot, keeping your stride lively and energized, even when you’re pushing past mile 20.

The Glycerin is all about luxurious softness for those who love a pampered run, while the Triumph adds a playful bounce that keeps you feeling upbeat through the longest miles.

Runners needing stability to keep overpronation in check will love the Brooks Adrenaline GTS and Saucony Guide, both of which are built to guide your stride without feeling restrictive. These shoes are designed to correct your form while still letting you run comfortably, but they each have a different feel. Here’s the breakdown: 

• Brooks Adrenaline GTS: Feels smooth and cushioned, keeping your foot on track without being too stiff— a shoe that quietly does its job while you focus on your run.  
• Saucony Guide: Provides a firmer, more locked-in ride, giving you a stable base to push through long miles— a shoe that doesn’t let you waver, even when you’re tired.

The Adrenaline works best for runners who want support with a softer feel, while the Guide is better for those who prefer a more rigid, controlled ride to stay aligned.

Trail runners tackling tough terrain will find the Brooks Cascadia and Saucony Peregrine to be strong options for off-road running, each built to handle different challenges. These shoes are designed to keep you moving on rocky or muddy trails, but they’re suited for distinct types of runs. Here’s how they compare:  

• Brooks Cascadia: Keeps you steady on uneven ground, handling rough trails well—like a shoe that won’t let you lose your footing, even on steep, rocky descents.  
• Saucony Peregrine: Grips the trail tightly, letting you move quickly over technical terrain—great for when you want to pick up the pace on tricky paths.

The Cascadia is better for long, rugged trail runs where staying balanced matters most, while the Peregrine excels on faster, technical trails where traction and speed are the priority.

When it comes to fit and feel, Saucony and Brooks cater to different preferences, making it essential to consider what works best for your feet and running style.

• Saucony shoes tend to have a snugger, performance-oriented fit, especially in the midfoot and heel. They often feel sleek and locked-in, ideal for runners who prefer a more connected sensation with the ground. The brand’s slightly narrower profile makes it a favorite among those with medium to narrow feet, but some models, like the Triumph and Endorphin series, offer a roomier toe box.
• Brooks, on the other hand, is known for its roomier, comfort-first fit, making it a great choice for runners who like a little extra space, especially in the toe box. The brand’s plush, structured upper designs provide a secure but forgiving feel, accommodating a variety of foot shapes, including wider feet.

If you prioritize a snug, performance-driven fit with a bit more responsiveness, Saucony may be the better option. But if you value all-day comfort, extra space, and a softer step-in feel, Brooks is the way to go.

There’s no definitive “winner” in the Saucony vs. Brooks debate—it all comes down to your individual preferences:

• Choose Saucony if you prefer a snug fit, responsive cushioning, and lightweight feel.
• Choose Brooks if you want a plush ride, a roomier fit, and reliable durability.

Whichever you pick, you’re getting a high-quality running shoe designed to support and enhance your performance. So lace up, hit the road, and enjoy the run!