Saucony vs ASICS in 2025: Which Wins?

Choosing the right pair of running shoes can feel like a race in itself—especially when you’re deciding between two powerhouses like Saucony and ASICS. Both brands have been in the game for decades, earning devoted followings and producing some of the most trusted shoes in the running world.

But when it comes to Saucony vs ASICS, how do you know which one is the better fit for your stride, your goals, and your feet?

In this in-depth comparison, we’ll break down the key differences between Saucony running shoes and ASICS running shoes, covering everything from cushioning technologies and fit to durability, price, and style. Whether you’re prepping for your next marathon or simply looking for a daily trainer that feels right, this guide will help you find your match.

Before we dive into the tech specs, let’s take a quick lap through history.

Saucony was founded in 1898 along the banks of Saucony Creek in Kutztown, Pennsylvania. What started as a humble footwear company evolved into a running brand known for blending performance and comfort with bold, modern designs. By the 1980s, Saucony had earned its place among serious runners thanks to its technical innovation and reliable shoes.

ASICS, meanwhile, began as Onitsuka Co. in 1949 in Japan. The company’s name—an acronym for the Latin phrase Anima Sana In Corpore Sano, meaning “a sound mind in a sound body”—speaks to its philosophy of holistic wellness through sport. From its early basketball shoes to today’s high-tech runners, ASICS running shoes have become synonymous with stability, durability, and cushion-heavy support.

Both brands bring decades of experience and a deep understanding of what runners need from their footwear.

Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 (Release: March 2024)

• Stack Height: 39 mm (heel), 35 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 4 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Performance (speed workouts, tempo runs, races like 5K to marathon)

Saucony Triumph 22 (Release: May 2024)  

• Stack Height: 37 mm (heel), 27 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 10 mm
• Primary Use: Road Running / Max Cushion (easy and long runs, max-cushioned for comfort and stability)

Saucony Guide 17 (Release: February 2024)  

• Stack Height: 30 mm (heel), 22 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Stability (daily training for runners with mild to moderate overpronation)

Saucony Ride 17 (Release: May 2024)  

• Stack Height: 35 mm (heel), 27 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Daily Trainer (versatile for everyday runs)

Saucony Kinvara 15 (Release: July 2024)  

• Stack Height: 29 mm (heel), 25 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 4 mm  
• Primary Use: Road Running / Lightweight (tempo runs, races, minimalist running)

Saucony Peregrine 15 (Release: July 2024)  

• Stack Height: 31 mm (heel), 27 mm (forefoot)  
• Drop: 4 mm  
• Primary Use: Trail Running (rugged trails, off-road conditions)

Related: Pro Picks: 9 Best Saucony Running Shoes for Training & Racing

Novablast 5 (released December 2024)

• Stack Height: 41 mm (heel) / 33 mm (forefoot)  
• Weight: 8.9 oz (252 g) for men’s US 9; women’s around 7.8 oz (220 g)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Versatile daily trainer, great for mid-to-long runs, tempo workouts, and casual wear. Its bouncy FF Blast Max foam makes it lively yet cushioned, appealing to runners seeking fun and comfort over pure speed.

Metaspeed Sky (released March 2024)

• Stack Height: 39.5 mm (heel) / 34.5 mm (forefoot)  
• Weight: 6.4 oz (183 g) for men’s US 9; women’s slightly heavier (~6.6 oz / 188 g)  
• Drop: 5 mm  
• Primary Use: Racing (5K to marathon), designed for stride runners with a powerful, bouncy forefoot strike. Ideal for chasing personal bests at faster paces.

Superblast 2 (released August 2024)

• Stack Height: 45.5 mm (heel) / 37.5 mm (forefoot)  
• Weight: 8.8 oz (250 g) for men’s US 9; women’s around 8.4 oz (238 g)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Versatile daily trainer, suitable for easy runs, long runs, and tempo efforts. A non-plated “super trainer” that balances comfort and speed.

Metaspeed Edge (released March 2024)

• Stack Height: 39.5 mm (heel) / 34.5 mm (forefoot)  
• Weight: 6.5 oz (185 g) for men’s US 9; women’s slightly heavier (~6.7 oz / 190 g)  
• Drop: 5 mm  
• Primary Use: Racing (5K to half marathon, extendable to marathon for some), tailored for cadence runners who rely on quick turnover and a rolling stride.

Gel-Kayano 31 (released December 2024)

• Stack Height: 41 mm (heel) / 31 mm (forefoot)  
• Weight: 10.6 oz (300 g) for men’s US 9; women’s around 9.2 oz (260 g)  
• Drop: 10 mm  
• Primary Use: Stability daily trainer, best for long, easy runs where comfort and pronation control are key. Built for runners needing support without sacrificing cushioning.

Gel-Nimbus 27 (released December 2024)

• Stack Height: 42 mm (heel) / 34 mm (forefoot) for men; 41 mm / 33 mm for women  
• Weight: 10.7 oz (305 g) for men’s US 9; women’s around 9.5 oz (270 g)  
• Drop: 8 mm  
• Primary Use: Neutral daily trainer, excels at easy-paced runs and recovery miles. Offers max cushioning and stability for high-mileage comfort.

Related: 9 Best ASICS Running Shoes to Keep Your Feet Happy for Miles

When comparing Saucony vs ASICS, one of the most significant differences lies in their approach to cushioning and ride feel.

🔹 Saucony Running Tech Highlights

• PWRRUN and PWRRUN+: These proprietary foam midsoles are built for bounce and comfort. PWRRUN+ is especially notable for its energy return and long-lasting cushioning, featured in shoes like the Endorphin Speed and Triumph.
• FORMFIT: This upper construction molds to the foot for a secure but adaptive fit, improving comfort and reducing hot spots over long miles.
• Speedroll Technology: Found in Saucony’s performance line, this rocker geometry promotes a forward-propelling sensation that’s perfect for tempo workouts and races.

🔸 ASICS Running Tech Highlights

• GEL Cushioning: ASICS’ most iconic tech, this silicone-based gel is strategically placed in the heel or forefoot to absorb impact and reduce joint stress.
• FlyteFoam and FF Blast: These lightweight foams deliver responsive, springy cushioning without adding bulk. FF Blast+ takes it a step further with an even lighter, bouncier ride.
• DUOMAX and LITETRUSS: Found in ASICS stability shoes, these technologies support runners who overpronate by reinforcing the medial side of the foot.

Both Saucony and ASICS are constantly innovating, but Saucony tends to emphasize a lighter, more flexible feel, while ASICS focuses on reliable cushioning and support for long-haul comfort.

No matter how good the tech is, a running shoe needs to fit your foot—and your stride.

• Saucony running shoes often run true to size with a slightly wider toe box, making them a great option for runners who prefer some wiggle room or who have broader feet.
• ASICS running shoes, on the other hand, are known for a snugger, more secure midfoot fit. This can be especially helpful for runners who like that “locked-in” feeling during faster efforts or technical terrain.

Both brands offer wide sizing in many models, but it’s worth noting that ASICS shoes tend to have a more structured heel counter, while Saucony's FORMFIT uppers provide a sock-like experience.

Pro tip: Try on both brands or consult brand-specific sizing charts if you’re switching from one to the other—especially for race-day models where fit precision matters.

Durability is another key factor in the Saucony vs ASICS debate, especially if you're logging big miles each week.

• Saucony shoes typically feature XT-900 carbon rubber outsoles, known for good durability on both roads and light trails. Models like the Ride and Triumph routinely hold up for 300–500 miles with proper care.
• ASICS shoes are built to last. Their AHAR (ASICS High Abrasion Rubber) outsoles and sturdy upper materials often make them a top pick for runners seeking maximum lifespan. Shoes like the GEL-Kayano or GT-2000 are praised for lasting well past the 400-mile mark.

In terms of longevity, both brands are impressive. But if you're extra tough on your shoes or running in harsher climates, ASICS running shoes might have a slight edge due to their heavier-duty construction.

Let’s get to the heart of what runners care about most—how the shoes actually feel during a run.

Saucony Running Performance

• Cushioning: PWRRUN and PWRRUN+ offer a soft-yet-snappy feel that adapts well to easy miles, long runs, and even race pace.
• Stability: Saucony’s stability shoes (like the Guide or Tempus) use subtle design features to provide support without feeling bulky.
• Speed: The Endorphin lineup is one of the most respected in the plated shoe market, delivering a propulsive ride without compromising comfort.

ASICS Running Performance

• Cushioning: GEL tech and FF Blast foams create a plush, protective ride. This is especially noticeable in the Nimbus and Cumulus series.
• Stability: ASICS goes big on structured support, and models like the Kayano are built for serious overpronators.
• Speed: ASICS has stepped up its game with super shoes like the Metaspeed Sky and Edge, offering carbon-plated power for competitive runners.

Whether you prefer the energetic roll of Saucony or the shock-absorbing calm of ASICS, both brands offer top-tier performance shoes for every type of run.

Performance might come first, but let’s be honest—most of us care about how our shoes look.

• Saucony has leaned into bold colorways, modern silhouettes, and limited-edition drops. If you like expressive, fashion-forward shoes, this might be your jam.
• ASICS tends to blend classic running looks with evolving tech details. While some designs skew traditional, their newer lines—especially race models—are sleek and standout-worthy.

At the end of the day, both brands have upped their design game in recent years. It just comes down to your personal vibe.

Price-wise, Saucony and ASICS fall in similar mid-to-premium ranges. Here’s how they generally compare:

• Saucony: Most daily trainers fall in the $120–$160 range, with performance shoes like the Endorphin Elite reaching up to $275. Saucony often hits a sweet spot between value and innovation.
• ASICS: Daily trainers start around $110, but stability and premium models like the GEL-Kayano or Metaspeed Sky can climb to $250+. The upside? Proven durability and tech-packed builds.

Both brands regularly offer discounts, and older versions of popular models are often found at a fraction of the price. Overall, you’re getting solid value no matter which brand you choose—just align your budget with the features you prioritize most.

If you’re a newer runner looking for value, both brands have affordable options that still offer solid performance. And if you're chasing a PR, you'll find super shoes in both lineups to give you an edge on race day.

So, which brand wins the Saucony vs ASICS showdown?

✅ Choose Saucony if:

• You want lightweight cushioning with responsive bounce.
• A roomy toe box and adaptive fit are priorities.
• You enjoy a modern look and feel with great value.
• You want a fast, fun ride for workouts and races.

✅ Choose ASICS if:

• You need plush cushioning with high-impact protection.
• Stability is a must for overpronation or joint support.
• Durability and long-term performance are top concerns.
• You prefer a more traditional, structured fit.

The truth is, both Saucony running shoes and ASICS running shoes have something incredible to offer. Your best bet? Try them on, test them out, and see which one feels like home on your next run.