Since I recently tested the Kila Running Insoles which are another 3d printed custom orthotic process I thought I would provide a comparison with the SuperFeet ME3D Insoles that you can see in the image.
SuperFeet ME3D
Price $109.99 to $139.99
Device Required Modern phone with camera
Foot Scanning Camera from mobile phone
3D Scanning Inside of foot only
User Friendly Very user friendly with no app to download
Packaging Quality packaging with some personalization
Shoe Fitting Requires trimming
Feel While Running Natural and comfortable
Support Material Hard 3D printed solid plastic material
Insole Material Closed cell foam with cloth and nice heel cushion
Durability Very durable with little wear showing after 100 miles
Kila Custom Running InsolesPrice $249.00
Device Required Modern phone with camera
Foot Scanning App downloaded to mobile phone
3D Scanning Entire foot
User Friendly Simple process once the app is downloaded
Packaging Quality packaging with personalization
Shoe Fitting No Trimming made custom to fit specific running shoe brand and model
Feel While Running Natural and comfortable
Support Material Softer honeycomb or woven filament material
Insole Material Thin closed cell foam with cloth
Durability Insole is showing compression marks from toes and forefoot
So which 3D printed insole is better? I think that is a tough question to answer. Ultimately it depends on what you are looking for in a 3D printed insole. I think the Kila Running Insoles might provide better performance and have better customization but the expense and long term durability might be concerns. The Superfeet ME3D has less customization and the insoles need to be trimmed, but the price is considerably less and the insoles appear to be more durable.