Runners shopping for max-cushion daily trainers often cross-shop models like the New Balance More v6, Hoka Bondi 9, or ASICS Gel Nimbus. The Up & Runners compared the Wave Sky 9 against each, plus Mizuno’s own Neo Vista.
Mizuno Wave Sky 9 vs. New Balance More v6:
Cody felt both shoes excel at recovery miles and long runs, but the Wave Sky 9 has a slightly more responsive midsole. The More v6 leans softer and pillowy, while the Sky 9 balances cushion with stability.
Related: Eric's Youtube comparison of the Wave Sky 9 vs New Balance Freshfoam X More v6
Mizuno Wave Sky 9 vs. Hoka Bondi 9:
Similar in purpose as high-stack, comfort-focused trainers, the Bondi 9 is lighter but can feel less lively. Cody found the Wave Sky 9 smoother and more responsive, while still protecting legs just as well.
Mizuno Wave Sky 9 vs. ASICS Gel Nimbus:
Eric compared the two directly, noting the Wave Sky 9 is more responsive and energetic underfoot. The Nimbus feels plush but flatter, while Mizuno’s dual-foam system gives a bouncier ride.
Mizuno Wave Sky 9 vs. Mizuno Neo Vista:
Blake pointed out that the Neo Vista is Mizuno’s super-trainer: softer foams, more rocker, and a plate for pop. The Wave Sky 9 skips the plate and rocker for a more traditional, stable max-cushion experience.
Mizuno Wave Sky 9 vs. ASICS Superblast 2:
Blake also compared it to the Superblast, which is much lighter and more versatile at faster paces. The Wave Sky 9, however, is plusher and better suited for long, easy efforts.
The consensus? The Wave Sky 9 sits comfortably in the max-cushion recovery trainer category, carving out its place as a stable, plush alternative for runners who value comfort over speed.